A Novel Model for Diagnosing High-Risk Pregnancies Using Bayesian Belief Network Algorithm and Particle Optimization

Azadeh Abkar, Amin Golabpour
368

Views


Abstract

Introduction: Diagnosis of high-risk maternal pregnancy is one of the most important issues during pregnancy and can be of great help to pregnant mothers. Also, early diagnosis can reduce mortality and morbidity in mothers.

Material and Methods: In this study, the data of 1014 pregnant mothers were used, which includes 272 people with high-risk pregnancies, 742 people with medium-risk and low-risk pregnancies. Also, the data include six independent variables. A combination of Bayesian belief network algorithms and particle optimization was used to predict pregnancy risk.

Results: For validation, the data model was divided into two sets of training and testing based on the method of 30-70. Then the proposed model was designed by training data. Then the model for training and testing data was evaluated in terms of accuracy parameters 99.18 and 98.32% accuracy were obtained, respectively. It has also performed between 0.5 and 8% better than similar work in the past.

Conclusion: In this study, a new model for designing Bayesian belief network was presented and it was found that this model can be useful for predicting maternal pregnancy risk.

Keywords

High-Risk Pregnancy; Bayesian Belief Network; Particle Optimization; Data Mining

References

Zhu X, Chen M, Wang H, Guo Y, Chan MHK, Yan H, et al. Clinical utility of expanded non‐invasive prenatal screening and chromosomal microarray analysis in high‐risk pregnancy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2021; 57(3): 459-65. PMID: 32198896 DOI: 10.1002/uog.22021

Holness N. High-risk pregnancy. Nurs Clin North Am. 2018; 53(2): 241-51. PMID: 29779516 DOI: 10.1016/j.cnur.2018.01.010

da Silva KDL, Fernandes FEM, de Lima Pessoa T, Lima SIVC, Oliveira AG, Martins RR. Prevalence and profile of adverse drug reactions in high-risk pregnancy: A cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019; 19(1): 199. PMID: 31185941 DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2321-8

Bezhenar VF, Ivanova LA, Grigoryev SG. High-risk pregnancy and perinatal losses. Akusherstvo Ginekologiya (Russian Federation). 2020; 2020(3): 42-7.

Ahmed M, Kashem MA. IoT based risk level prediction model for maternal health care in the context of Bangladesh. International Conference on Sustainable Technologies for Industry. IEEE; 2020.

Sumner M, Frank E, Hall M. Speeding up logistic model tree induction. European Conference on Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. Springer; 2005.

Ahmed M, Kashem MA, Rahman M, Khatun S. Review and analysis of risk factor of maternal health in remote area using the Internet of Things (IoT). International Conference on Electrical, Control & Computer Engineering. Springer; 2019.

Vemuri PK, Kunta A, Challagulla R, Bodiga S, Veeravilli S, Lakshmi Bodiga V, et al. Artificial intelligence and internet of medical things based health-care system for real-time maternal stress–strategies to reduce maternal mortality rate. Drug Invention Today. 2020; 13(7): 1126-9.

Ahouz F, Sadehvand M, Golabpour A. Extracting rules for diagnosis of diabetes using genetic programming. International Journal of Health Studies. 2019; 5(3): 1-10.

Ahmed M. Maternal health risk data set data set [Internet]. 2020 [cited: 1 Oct 2020]. Available from: https://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml/datasets/Maternal+Health+Risk+Data+Set

Premchaiswadi W. Bayesian Networks. IntechOpen; 2012.

Goovaerts P. Comparative performance of indicator algorithms for modeling conditional probability distribution functions. Mathematical Geology. 1994; 26(3): 389-411.

Clerc M. Particle swarm optimization. Wiley; 2013.

Sun J, Lai CH, Wu XJ. Particle swarm optimisation: Classical and quantum perspectives. CRC Press; 2016.

Vagnoli M, Remenyte-Prescott R, Andrews J. A Bayesian belief network method for bridge deterioration detection. Journal of Risk and Reliability. 2021; 235(3): 338-55.

Eyre RW, House T, Gómez-Olivé FX, Griffiths FE. Bayesian belief network modelling of household food security in rural South Africa. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21(1): 935. PMID: 34001089 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-10938-y

Simsek S, Dag A, Tiahrt T, Oztekin A. A Bayesian belief network-based probabilistic mechanism to determine patient no-show risk categories. Omega; 2021.

Fasaee MAK, Berglund E, Pieper KJ, Ling E, Benham B, Edwards M. Developing a framework for classifying water lead levels at private drinking water systems: A Bayesian Belief Network approach. Water Research. 2021; 189: 116641.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.30699/fhi.v11i1.351

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.