Introduction: As the COVID-19 pandemic spreads around the world, governments are seeking solutions to mitigate contagion. These initiatives use technology to control the movement of infected people, particularly from mobile phone monitoring. This manuscript intends in the first stage to carry out a brief overview of these initiatives at the global level. After that, it aims to identify the main challenges posed by these apps in monitoring the individual's health data and explore good practices that may prove fundamental for the uptake of these solutions on a large-scale.
Materials and Methods: This study employs a qualitative methodology to perform a review on technological solutions for screening and geolocation of COVID-19 infected people. Five countries have been selected considering the different approaches in the implementation of these technological solutions. Four fundamental principles for the evaluation of these solutions such as consent, proportionality, transparency, and security were considered. Through this approach, it has become feasible to identify and discuss the challenges and best practices in the implementation of these solutions.
Results: Although these applications publicly assume that they guarantee people's fundamental rights this information becomes insufficient. It is necessary to evaluate these solutions specifically considering fundamental principles such as consent, proportionality, transparency, and security. The existence of an independent body authority that can audit these solutions is relevant, besides the voluntary adherence to these applications.
Conclusion: The way these solutions are implemented and imposed in these countries is quite different. The absence of mechanisms to measure how data is stored and processed raise concerns among people. Accordingly, the large-scale adoption of these tools requires that people's fundamental rights be duly considered from a multidimensional perspective.
Davis TL, DiClemente R, Prietula M. Taking mHealth forward: Examining the core characteristics. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016; 4(3): e97. PMID: 27511612 DOI: 10.2196/mhealth.5659
Park YT. Emerging New Era of Mobile Health Technologies. Healthc Inform Res. 2016; 22(4): 253-4. PMID: 27895955 DOI: 10.4258/hir.2016.22.4.253
Riley WT, Rivera DE, Atienza AA, Nilsen W, Allison SM, Mermelstein R. Health behavior models in the age of mobile interventions: Are our theories up to the task? Transl Behav Med. 2011; 1(1): 53-71. PMID: 21796270 DOI: 10.1007/s13142-011-0021-7
Rowland SP, Fitzgerald JE, Holme T, Powell J, McGregor A. What is the clinical value of mHealth for patients? NPJ Digit Med. 2020; 3: 4. PMID: 31970289 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0206-x
Whittaker R. Issues in mHealth: Findings from key informant interviews. J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14(5): e129. PMID: 23032424 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1989
Sannino G, Bouguila N, De Pietro G, Celesti A. Artificial intelligence for mobile health data analysis and processing. Mobile Information Systems. 2019; 2019: 673463.
Lehne M, Sass J, Essenwanger A, Schepers J, Thun S. Why digital medicine depends on interoperability. NPJ Digit Med. 2019; 2(79): 1-5. PMID: 31453374 DOI: 10.1038/s41746-019-0158-1
Vaghefi I, Tulu B. The continued use of mobile health apps: Insights from a longitudinal study. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019; 7(8): e12983. PMID: 31469081 DOI: 10.2196/12983
Abeler J, Bäcker M, Buermeyer U, Zillessen H. COVID-19 contact tracing and data protection can go together. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020; 8(4): e19359. PMID: 32294052 DOI: 10.2196/19359
Akbar S, Coiera E, Magrabi F. Safety concerns with consumer-facing mobile health applications and their consequences: A scoping review. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2020; 27(2): 330-40. PMID: 31599936 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocz175
Rahman F, Addo ID, Ahamed SI, Yang JJ, Wang Q. Chapter two: Privacy challenges and goals in mHealth systems. Advances in Computers. 2016;102: 47-62.
Holmes A. South Korea is relying on technology to contain COVID-19, including measures that would break privacy laws in the US - and so far, it's working [Internet]. 2020 [cited: 12 Aug 2020]. Available from: https://www.businessinsider.com/coronavirus-south-korea-tech-contact-tracing-testing-fight-covid-19-2020-5
Ko J. How China used technology to combat COVID-19 and tighten its grip on citizens [Internet]. 2020 [cited: 10 Sep 2020]. Available from: https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2020/04/how-china-used-technology-to-combat-covid-19-and-tighten-its-grip-on-citizens/
Weinland D. China’s Covid-19 QR code surveillance state [Internet]. 2020 [cited: 27 Sep 2020]. Available from: https://www.ft.com/content/eee43c3e-8f7c-11ea-9b25-c36e3584cda8
Yi Z, Kang S. Fighting COVID-19 with AI: Efforts and lessons from China [Internet]. 2020 [cited: 10 Sep 2020]. Available from: https://www.globaltimes.cn/content/1181846.shtml
Kim MS. South Korea is watching quarantined citizens with a smartphone app [Internet]. 2020 [cited: 10 Sep 2020]. Available from: https://www.technologyreview.com/2020/03/06/905459/coronavirus-south-korea-smartphone-app-quarantine/
Koh D. Singapore government launches new app for contact tracing to combat spread of COVID-19 [Internet]. 2020 [cited: 6 Sep 2020]. Available from: https://www.mobihealthnews.com/news/asia-pacific/singapore-government-launches-new-app-contact-tracing-combat-spread-covid-19
Uibu K. Poland is making its citizens use a 'selfie' app during the coronavirus crisis [Internet]. 2020 [cited: 28 Aug 2020]. Available from: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2020-04-25/coronavirus-poland-tracking-quarantine-selfie-app/12173884
Worm U, Bruder AE. Germany: COVID-19-App released in Germany [Internet]. 2020 [cited: 5 Oct 2020]. Available from: https://www.mondaq.com/germany/reporting-and-compliance/931666/covid-19-app-released-in-germany
Kotz D, Gunter CA, Kumar S, Weiner J. Privacy and security in mobile health: A research agenda. Computer (Long Beach Calif). 2016; 49(6): 22-30. PMID: 28344359 DOI: 10.1109/MC.2016.185
Covid-19 apps pose serious human rights risks [Internet]. 2020 [cited: 29 Aug 2020]. Available from: https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/05/13/covid-19-apps-pose-serious-human-rights-risks
Van Kolfschooten H, Ruijter A. COVID-19 and privacy in the European Union: A legal perspective on contact tracing. Contemporary Security Policy 2020; 41(3): 478-91.
States responses to Covid-19 threat should not halt freedoms of assembly and association–UN expert on the rights to freedoms of peaceful assembly and of association, Mr. Clément Voule [Internet]. 2020 [cited: 17 Sep 2020]. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=25788
Everyone included: Social impact of COVID-19 [Internet]. 2020 [cited: 19 Sep 2020]. Available from: https://www.un.org/development/desa/dspd/everyone-included-covid-19.html
Belzunegui-Eraso A, Erro-Garcés A. Teleworking in the context of the Covid-19 crisis. Sustainability. 2020; 12: 1-18.
Kelley M, Ferrand RA, Muraya K, Chigudu S, Molyneux S, Pai M et al. An appeal for practical social justice in the COVID-19 global response in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet Global Health. 2020; 8(7): 888-9. PMID: 32416766 DOI: 10.1016/S2214-109X(20)30249-7
Elavarasan RM, Pugazhendhi R. Restructured society and environment: A review on potential technological strategies to control the COVID-19 pandemic. Sci Total Environ. 2020; 725: e138858. PMID: 32336562 DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138858