Introduction: The study purpose is to identify the issues and challenges of the Prosthetic and Orthotic (P&O) rehabilitation services in India
Material and Methods: The online search strategy included electronic search engine databases: Google Scholar, PubMed, Google, and Medline along with websites search of world Health Organisation, Government of India relevant Ministries, and Rehabilitation Council of India. All relevant articles were included and included in the present study.
Results: In the future, the population growth, older population, increased risk of accidents and other complications may result in more prosthetic and orthotic service demand. To improve their access to the environment and income prosthetic and orthotic rehabilitation needs to be endorsed at the grassroots level. Health care expenses can be reduced through better Prosthetic and Orthotic rehabilitation services. and the user's quality of life may enhance through improved movement.
Conclusion: Policymakers and the leaders of health, rehabilitation, and social care providers should facilitate access to appropriate prosthetic and orthotic technology that provides functional and economic independence. As functioning prosthetic and orthotic device will promote social acceptance to the physically challenged and improve their quality of life, satisfaction, education, and job opportunities.
World Health Organization. Guidelines for training personnel in developing countries for prosthetics and orthotics services [Internet]. 2005 [cited: 1 Oct 2020]. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43127
World Health Organization. Standards for prothetics and orthotics [Internet]. 2017 [cited: 27 Oct 2020]. Available from: http://apps.who.int/bookorders.
Dobson A, Murray K, Manolov N, Davanzo JE. Economic value of orthotic and prosthetic services among medicare beneficiaries: A claims-based retrospective cohort study, 2011-2014. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018; 15(Suppl 1): 55. PMID: 30255806 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-018-0406-7
Price P. The diabetic foot: Quality of life. Clin Infect Dis. 2004; 39 (Suppl 2): S129-31. PMID: 15306991 DOI: 10.1086/383274
Davies S, Gibby O, Phillips C, Price P, Tyrrell W. The health status of diabetic patients receiving orthotic therapy. Qual Life Res. 2000; 9(2): 233-40. PMID: 10983486 DOI: 10.1023/a:1008979825851
Healy A, Farmer S, Pandyan A, Chockalingam N. A systematic review of randomised controlled trials assessing effectiveness of prosthetic and orthotic interventions. PLoS One. 2018; 13(3): e0192094. PMID: 29538382 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192094
Magnusson L. Prosthetic and orthotic services in developing countries [MSc Thesis]. Jönköping University; 2014.
Rimmer JH, Rowland JL. Health promotion for people with disabilities: Implications for empowering the person and promoting disability-friendly environments. American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine. 2008; 2(5): 409–20.
World Health Organization. Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health- Final report of the commission on social determinants of health [Internet]. 2008 [cited: 27 Oct 2020]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-IER-CSDH-08.1
Monawar Hosain GM, Chatterjee N. Health-care utilization by disabled persons: A survey in rural Bangladesh. Disabil Rehabil. 1998; 20(9): 337-45. PMID: 9664192 DOI: 10.3109/09638289809166091
Dorji S, Solomon P. Attitudes of health professionals toward persons with disabilities in Bhutan. Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal. 2009; 20(2): 4.
Rehabilitation Council of India [Internet]. 1986 [cited: 27 Oct 2020]. Available from: http://rehabcouncil.nic.in/
Varghese J, Grills N, Mathias K. Barriers in health care access faced by children with intellectual disabilities living in rural Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Social Inclusion. 2015; 6 (1): 55-70.
Kumar A, Mishra N. A review on childhood disability and its direct and indirect cost to families. International Journal of Management. 2014; 5(11): 96-102.
Disabilities affairs [Internet]. 2020 [cited: 27 Oct 2020]. Available from: http://disabilityaffairs.gov.in/content/page/national-institutes.php
Directorate general of health services [Internet]. 1955 [cited: 27 Oct 2020]. Available from: https://dghs.gov.in/content/1416_1_AIIPMRMumbai.aspx
Kumar Sg, Roy G, Kar S. Disability and rehabilitation services in India: Issues and challenges. J Family Med Prim Care. 2012; 1(1): 69-73. PMID: 24479007 DOI: 10.4103/2249-4863.94458
Disabilities affairs. Artificial limbs manufacturing corporation of India [Internet]. 1976 [cited: 27 Oct 2020]; Available from: http://disabilityaffairs.gov.in/content/page/artificial-limbs-manufacturing-corporation-of-india.php
Lang R, Kett M, Groce N, Trani JF. Implementing the United Nations Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities: Principles, implications, practice and limitations. Alter. 2011; 5(3): 206-20.
Banerjee R. Towards inclusive education in India: Implementation of Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. TASH Connections. 2014; 40(3): 9–13.
Chapter 8; Government initiatives for redressal of disability in India. 2006.
The Rehabilitation Council of India. Act [Internet]. 1992 [cited: 27 Oct 2020]. Available from: http://www.rehabcouncil.nic.in/writereaddata/rciact.pdf
Math S, Gowda G, Basavaraju V, Manjunatha N, Kumar C, Philip S, et al. The rights of persons with disability act, 2016: Challenges and opportunities. Indian J Psychiatry. 2019; 61(Suppl 4): S809-15. PMID: 31040479 DOI: 10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_105_19
Disabilities affairs. Rules and regulations [Internet]. 1997 [cited: 27 Oct 2020]. Available from: http://disabilityaffairs.gov.in/content/page/rules-regulations.php
Magnusson L, Ghosh R, Jensen KR, Göbel K, Wågberg J, Wallén S, et al. Quality of life of prosthetic and orthotic users in South India: A cross-sectional study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2019;17(1): 50. PMID: 30894184 DOI: 10.1186/s12955-019-1116-y
Saikia N, Bora JK, Jasilionis D, Shkolnikov VM. Disability Divides in India: Evidence from the 2011 Census. PLoS One. 2016; 11(8): e0159809. PMID: 27490469 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0159809
Kumar A, Vinita V. Prosthetics and orthotics in rehabilitation: A short communication. Global Journal for Research Analysis. 2020; 9(8): 17–8.
Rehabilitation Council of India. Categories US 19 [Internet]. 2017 [cited: 27 Oct 2020]. Available from: http://rehabcouncil.nic.in/forms/Sublink1.aspx?lid=813
Mohan D. A report on amputees in India. Orthotics and Prosthetics. 1986; 40(1): 16-32.
Planning Commission Programme Evaluation Organisation Government of India. The scheme of assistance to differently abled persons for purchase/fitting of aids/appliances [Internet]. 2013 [cited: 28 Oct 2020]. Available from: https://niti.gov.in/planningcommission.gov.in/docs/reports/peoreport/peo/eva_adip1501.pdf
Niti Ayog. Research study on identifying and profiling skill development activities for generating potential employment opportunities for the persons with disabilities [Internet]. 2016 [cited: 28 Oct 2020]. Available from: https://www.niti.gov.in/niti/writereaddata/files/document_publication/Report_Skill dev_Disabilities_0.pdf
Marino M, Pattni S, Greenberg M, Miller A, Hocker E, Ritter S, et al. Access to prosthetic devices in developing countries: Pathways and challenges. IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference. IEEE; 2015.
Nielsen C. Issues affecting the future demand for orthotists and prosthetists. National Commission on Orthotic and Prosthetic Education; 1996.
Magnusson L, Ahlström G. Patients’ satisfaction with lower-limb prosthetic and orthotic devices and service delivery in Sierra Leone and Malawi. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017; 17(1): 102. PMID: 28143549 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-017-2044-3
Highsmith MJ, Kahle JT, Bongiorni DR, Sutton BS, Groer S, Kaufman KR. Safety, energy efficiency, and cost efficacy of the C-Leg for transfemoral amputees: A review of the literature. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2010; 34(4): 362-77. PMID: 20969495 DOI: 10.3109/03093646.2010.520054
Dobson A, El-Gamil A, Shimer M, DaVanzo JE. Economic value of prosthetic services among medicare beneficiaries: A claims-based retrospective cohort study. Mil Med. 2016; 181(2 Suppl): 18-24. PMID: 26835740 DOI: 10.7205/MILMED-D-15-00545
Highsmith MJ, Kahle JT, Miro RM, Lura DJ, Dubey RV, Carey SL, et al. Perceived differences between the genium and the C-leg microprocessor prosthetic knees in prosthetic-related function and quality of life. Technology & Innovation. 2014;15: 369-75.
Gupta N, Castillo-Laborde C, Landry MD. Health-related rehabilitation services: assessing the global supply of and need for human resources. BMC Health Serv Res. 2011; 11: 276. PMID: 22004560 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-11-276