Introduction: Ultrasound images are one of the main contributors for evaluating of thyroid nodules. However, reading ultrasound imaging is not easy and strongly depends to doctors’ experiences. Therefore, a CAD system could assist doctors in evaluating thyroid ultrasound images to reduce the impact of subjective experience on the diagnostic results.
Objective: with the best of our knowledge there is not any articles that actually provide a systematic review of deep learning application in analyzing ultrasound images of thyroid nodules and Hence, a comprehensive review of studies in this field can be useful, therefore the protocol of this systematic Review will be presented to reach this goal.
Method: This protocol includes five stages: research questions definition, search strategy design, study selection, quality assessment and data extraction. We developed search for relevant English language articles using the PubMed, Scopus and Science Direct. Inclusion and exclusion criteria were defined and flow diagram is conducted, from 623 studies retrieved, 27 studies were included, after quality assessment data was extracted based on defined categories.
Result: The result of this systematic review can help researchers by comprehensive view and the summary of evidence to present new ideas and further research and represent a state of the art in this field.Conclusion: in this study a protocol was used for doing a systematic review on various deep learning applications in thyroid ultrasound such as feature selection, classification, localization, detection and segmentation. Articles were screened based on the following items: study and patient information, dataset, method, results and comparison method.
Khachnaoui H, Guetari R, Khlifa N. A review on deep learning in thyroid ultrasound computer-assisted diagnosis systems. International Conference on Image Processing, Applications and Systems. 2018: IEEE.
Cooper DS, Doherty GM, Haugen BR, Kloos RT, Lee SL, Mandel SJ, et al. Revised American thyroid association management guidelines for patients with thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer. Thyroid. 2009; 19(11): 1167-214. PMID: 19860577 DOI: 10.1089/thy.2009.0110
Zhuang Y, Li C, Hua Z, Chen K, Lin JL. A novel TIRADS of US classification. Biomed Eng Online. 2018; 17: 82. PMID: 29914498 DOI: 10.1186/s12938-018-0507-3
Chi J, Walia E, Babyn P, Wang J, Groot G, Eramian M. Thyroid nodule classification in ultrasound images by fine-tuning deep convolutional neural network. J Digit Imaging . 2017; 30(4): 477-86. PMID: 28695342 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-017-9997-y
Acharya UR, Swapna G, Sree SV, Molinari F, Gupta S, Bardales RH, et al. A review on ultrasound-based thyroid cancer tissue characterization and automated classification. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2014; 13(4): 289-301. PMID: 24206204 DOI: 10.7785/tcrt.2012.500381
Li X, Wang S, Wei X, Zhu J, Yu R, Zhao M, et al. Fully convolutional networks for ultrasound image segmentation of thyroid nodules. International Conference on High Performance Computing and Communications. 2018: IEEE.
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G. Deep learning. Nature. 2015; 521(7553): 436-44. PMID: 26017442 DOI: 10.1038/nature14539
Guan Q, Wang Y, Du J, Qin Y, Lu H, Xiang J, et al. Deep learning based classification of ultrasound images for thyroid nodules: A large scale of pilot study. Ann Transl Med. 2019; 7(7): 137. PMID: 31157258 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.04.34
Kumar A, Kim J, Lyndon D, Fulham M, Feng D. An ensemble of fine-tuned convolutional neural networks for medical image classification. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2017; 21(1): 31-40. PMID: 28114041 DOI: 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2635663
Miotto R, Wang F, Wang S, Jiang X, Dudley JT. Deep learning for healthcare: Review, opportunities and challenges. Brief Bioinform. 2018; 19(6): 1236-46. PMID: 28481991 DOI: 10.1093/bib/bbx044
Lee J-G, Jun S, Cho Y-W, Lee H, Kim GB, Seo JB, et al. Deep learning in medical imaging: General overview. Korean J Radiol. 2017; 18(4): 570-84. PMID: 28670152 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2017.18.4.570
Suzuki K. Overview of deep learning in medical imaging. Radiol Phys Technol. 2017; 10(3): 257-73. PMID: 28689314 DOI: 10.1007/s12194-017-0406-5
Bakator M, Radosav D. Deep learning and medical diagnosis: A review of literature. Multimodal Technologies Interact. 2018; 2(3): 47.
Huang Q, Luo Y, Zhang Q. Breast ultrasound image segmentation: A survey. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2017; 12(3): 493-507. PMID: 28070777 DOI: 10.1007/s11548-016-1513-1
Jabarulla MY, Lee H-N. Computer aided diagnostic system for ultrasound liver images: A systematic review. Optik. 2017; 140: 1114-26.
Cheng H-D, Shan J, Ju W, Guo Y, Zhang L. Automated breast cancer detection and classification using ultrasound images: A survey. Pattern Recognition. 2010; 43(1): 299-317.
Sollini M, Cozzi L, Chiti A, Kirienko M. Texture analysis and machine learning to characterize suspected thyroid nodules and differentiated thyroid cancer: Where do we stand? Eur J Radiol. 2018; 99: 1-8. PMID: 29362138 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.12.004
Huang Q, Zhang F, Li X. Machine learning in ultrasound computer-aided diagnostic systems: A survey. Biomed Res Int. 2018; 2018: 5137904. PMID: 29687000 DOI: 10.1155/2018/5137904
Kitchenham B, Charters S. Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering. Keele University and Durham University Joint Report (EBSE 2007-001). 2007.
Malhotra R. A systematic review of machine learning techniques for software fault prediction. Applied Soft Computing. 2015; 27: 504-18.
Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(7): e1000097. PMID: 19621072 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977; 33(1): 159-74.