• Logo
  • HamaraJournals

New and Emerging Mobile Technologies for Healthcare (mHealth): A Horizon Scanning Study

Azar Kazemi, Hosna Salmani, Alireza Shakibafard, Farhad Fatehi
314

Views


Abstract

Introduction: The popularity of mobile phone applications (Apps) and wearable devices for medical and health purposes is on the rise, but not all the mobile health (mHealth) innovative solutions that hit the news every day will sustain and have an impact on the health of people. The aim of this news-based horizon scanning study was to explore and identify new and emerging mobile technologies that are likely to impact the future of health and medical care.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search on top ranking technology websites, according to Alexa Ranking, to identify health-related mobile-based technologies. We followed the EuroScan guide for horizon scanning, which recommends four steps: identification, filtering, prioritization, evaluation and conclusion. Technologies of interest were mHealth technologies regardless of their maturity level. The impact of technologies was assessed and scored in four areas: user, technology, safety, and cost.

Results: Five hundred news articles were identified through the electronic search. After screening, 106 mHealth innovative technologies were included in this study. We categorized the included technologies into three groups: mobile apps (n=37), smart-connected devices (n=19), and wearables (n=50). mHealth technologies were most frequently developed for preventive health services, mental health services and rehabilitation services. There was no remarkable difference between the technology groups in terms of safety and adverse effects, but the groups were significantly different in terms of the target population, technology, and cost.

Conclusion: An increasing number of solutions based on mobile technology is being developed by both public and private sectors but a low proportion of them undergo proper scientific evaluations. Despite the commercial availability of many innovative mobile apps, wearables, and smart connected devices, few of them have been actually used in clinics, hospitals, and health centers. There is a clear need for changes in healthcare service models to unlock the full potential of these innovative technologies.


References

Catwell L, Sheikh A. Evaluating eHealth interventions: The need for continuous systemic evaluation. PLoS Med. 2009; 6(8): e1000126. PMID: 19688038 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000126

Hutchesson MJ, Rollo ME, Krukowski R, Ells L, Harvey J, Morgan PJ, et al. eHealth interventions for the prevention and treatment of overweight and obesity in adults: A systematic review with meta‐analysis. Obes Rev. 2015; 16(5): 376-92. PMID: 25753009 DOI: 10.1111/obr.12268

Fatehi F, Wootton R. Telemedicine, telehealth or e-health? A bibliometric analysis of the trends in the use of these terms. J Telemed Telecare. 2012; 18(8): 460-4. PMID: 23209265 DOI: 10.1258/jtt.2012.gth108

van Velsen L, Beaujean DJMA, van Gemert-Pijnen JEWC. Why mobile health app overload drives us crazy, and how to restore the sanity. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2013; 13(1): 23-8.

Gay V, Leijdekkers P. Bringing health and fitness data together for connected health care: Mobile apps as enablers of interoperability. J Med Internet Res. 2015; 17(11): e260. PMID: 26581920 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5094

Lee BM. Design requirements for IoT healthcare model using an open IoT platform. Advanced Science and Technology Letters. 2014; 66: 69-72.

Lawler J, Moller H, Salloum R. A case study on empowering a non-profit organization to better help people with disabilities through m-Health. Wilson Center for Social Entrepreneurship; 2014.

Roy HE, Peyton J, Aldridge DC, Bantock T, Blackburn TM, Britton R, et al. Horizon scanning for invasive alien species with the potential to threaten biodiversity in Great Britain. Global Change Biology. 2014; 20(12): 3859-71.

Gutierrez-Ibarluzea I, Simpson S, Benguria-Arrate G. Early awareness and alert systems: an overview of EuroScan methods. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012; 28(3): 301-7. PMID: 22980708 DOI: 10.1017/S0266462312000360

Carlsson P, Jorgensen T. Scanning the horizon for emerging health technologies. Conclusions from a European Workshop. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1998; 14(4): 695-704. PMID: 9885460

Simpson S. A toolkit for the identification and assessment of new and emerging health technologies. EuroScan International Network, Birmingham, UK; 2014.

Douw K, Vondeling H. Selection of new health technologies for assessment aimed at informing decision making: A survey among horizon scanning systems. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2006; 22(2): 177-83. PMID: 16571193 DOI: 10.1017/S0266462306050999

Smith J, Ward D, Michaelides M, Moore AT, Simpson S. New and emerging technologies for the treatment of inherited retinal diseases: A horizon scanning review. Eye. 2015; 29(9): 1131-40. PMID: 26113499 DOI: 10.1038/eye.2015.115

Varela-Lema L, Punal-Riobóo J, Acción BC, Ruano-Ravina A, García ML. Making processes reliable: a validated pubmed search strategy for identifying new or emerging technologies. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2012; 28(4): 452-9. PMID: 22995101 DOI: 10.1017/S0266462312000578

Palomino MA, Vincenti A, Owen R. Optimising web-based information retrieval methods for horizon scanning. Foresight. 2013; 15(3): 159-76.

Palomino MA, Taylor T, Owen R. Towards the development of an automated, web-based, horizon scanning system. Federated Conference on Computer Science and Information Systems. IEEE; 2012.

Alexa. How are Alexa’s traffic rankings determined? [Internet]. 2016 [updated 2019; cited 23 Mar 2019]. Available from: https://support.alexa.com/hc/en-us/articles/200449744-How-are-Alexa-s-traffic-rankings-determined.

Mayer J, Nachtnebel A. Disinvesting from ineffective technologies: Lessons learned from current programs. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2015; 31(6): 355-62. PMID: 26694654 DOI: 10.1017/S0266462315000641

Chen M, Ma YJ, Song J, Lai CF, Hu B. Smart clothing: Connecting human with clouds and big data for sustainable health monitoring. Mobile Networks & Applications. 2016; 21(5): 825-45.

Gao YW, Li H, Luo Y. An empirical study of wearable technology acceptance in healthcare. Industrial Management & Data Systems. 2015; 115(9): 1704-23.

Zhang M, Luo M, Nie R, Zhang Y. Technical attributes, health attribute, consumer attributes and their roles in adoption intention of healthcare wearable technology. Int J Med Inform. 2017; 108: 97-109. PMID: 29132639 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.09.016

Li H, Wu J, Gao Y, Shi Y. Examining individuals’ adoption of healthcare wearable devices: An empirical study from privacy calculus perspective. Int J Med Inform. 2016 Apr;88:8-17. PMID: 26878757 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.010

Patel MS, Asch DA, Volpp KG. Wearable devices as facilitators, not drivers, of health behavior change. JAMA. 2015; 313(5): 459-60. PMID: 25569175 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2014.14781

Robson K, Pitt L, Kietzmann J, Halvorson W, Wallstrom A. Wearable technology: Trends and opportunities for organizations. In: Kim KK. (Ed.) Celebrating america’s pastimes: Baseball, hot dogs, apple pie and marketing? Springer; 2016.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.30699/fhi.v8i1.196

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.