Introduction: Email is a beneficial way in order to increase interaction between patients and physicians. Since using this technology, patients and different physicians are able to increase patients’ health level and the amount of physicians’ duties. This study was done to identify the applications of email in communications between patients and physicians.
Materials and Methods: The current study is a systematized review conducted in 2019. The literature search done by the relevant keywords to the subject in databases: Web of Science, Scopus, PubMed, Science Direct and Cochran. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria 34 articles were included. Based on the study’s aim, results were summarized and reported by Content Analysis Technique.
Results: The results showed that 15 articles (44%) using email technology to investigate laboratory’s resources. Utilizing email in 9 articles (26%) showed that it caused an improvement in healthcare quality.
Conclusion: Results showed that use of email’s capabilities has a key role in improving healthcare quality as well as time saving. So, we suggest that the authorities deploy certain and codified mechanism in order to utilizing email communication between patients and physicians.
Ortiz E, Clancy CM. Use of information technology to improve the quality of health care in the United States. Health Serv Res. 2003; 38(2): xi–xxii. PMID: 12785557 DOI: 10.1111/1475-6773.00127
Ziadlou D, Eslami A, Hassani HR. Telecommunication methods for implementation of telemedicine systems in crisis. Third International Conference on Broadband Communications, Information Technology & Biomedical Applications. IEEE; 2008.
Dash J, Haller DM, Sommer J, Junod Perron N. Use of email, cell phone and text message between patients and primary-care physicians: Cross-sectional study in a French-speaking part of Switzerland. Health Serv Res. 2016; 16(1): 549-56. PMID: 27716256 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1776-9
Singh H, Fox SA, Petersen NJ, Shethia A, Street RL. Older patients’ enthusiasm to use electronic mail to communicate with their physicians: Cross-sectional survey. J Med Internet Res. 2009; 11(2): e18. PMID: 19632972 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1143
Gerstle RS. E-mail communication between pediatricians and their patients. Pediatrics. 2004; 114(1): 317-21. PMID: 15231952
Samadbeik M, Ahmadi M, Mohammadi A, Mohseni Saravi B. Health information on Internet: Quality, importance, and popularity of persian health websites. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014; 16(4): 1-12. PMID: 24910795 DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.12866
Fridsma DB, Ford P, Altman R. A survey of patient access to electronic mail: Attitudes, barriers, and opportunities. Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1994; 1: 15-9. PMID: 7949909
Sittig DF. Results of a content analysis of electronic messages (email) sent between patients and their physicians. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2003; 3(1): 11-6. PMID: 14519206 DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-3-11
Kashgary A, Alsolaimani R, Mosli M, Faraj S. The role of mobile devices in doctor-patient communication: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare. 2017; 23(8): 693-700. PMID: 27632990 DOI: 10.1177/1357633X16661604
Patel PB, Vinson DR. Physician e-mail and telephone contact after emergency department visit improves patient satisfaction: A crossover trial. Ann Emerg Med. 2013; 61(6): 631-7. PMID: 23465304 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2012.12.005
Lee JL, Choudhry NK, Wu AW, Matlin OS, Brennan TA, Shrank WH. Patient use of email, facebook, and physician websites to communicate with physicians: A national online survey of retail pharmacy users. J Gen Intern Med. 2016; 31(1): 45-51. PMID: 26105675 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-015-3374-7
Leong SL, Gingrich D, Lewis PR, Mauger DT, George JH. Enhancing doctor-patient communication using email: A pilot study. J Am Board Fam Med. 2005; 18(3): 180-8. PMID: 15879565
Baer D. Patient-physician e-mail communication: The Kaiser Permanente experience. J Oncol Pract. 2011; 7(4): 230-3. PMID: 22043186 DOI: 10.1200/JOP.2011.000323
Peleg R, Avdalimov A, Freud T. Providing cell phone numbers and email addresses to patients: The physician's perspective. BMC Res Notes. 2011 23;4(1): 76-84. PMID: 21426591 DOI: 10.1186/1756-0500-4-76
Dash J, Haller DM, Sommer J, Perron NJ. Use of email, cell phone and text message between patients and primary-care physicians: cross-sectional study in a French-speaking part of Switzerland. Health Serv Res. 2016; 16(1): 549-56. PMID: 27716256 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-016-1776-9
Eysenbach G. Towards ethical guidelines for dealing with unsolicited patient emails and giving teleadvice in the absence of a pre-existing patient-physician relationship: Systematic review and expert survey. J Med Internet Res. 2000; 2(1): e1. PMID: 11720920 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.2.1.e1
Bovi AM. Ethical guidelines for use of electronic mail between patients and physicians. Am J Bioeth. 2003; 3(3): 43-7. PMID: 14735881 DOI: 10.1162/152651603322874771
Garrido T, Meng D, Wang JJ, Palen TE, Kanter MH. Secure e-mailing between physicians and patients: Transformational change in ambulatory care.
J Ambul Care Manage. 2014; 37(3): 211-8. PMID: 24887522 DOI: 10.1097/JAC.0000000000000043
Brooks RG, Menachemi N. Physicians’ use of email with patients: factors influencing electronic communication and adherence to best practices. J Med Internet Res. 2006; 8(1): e2. PMID: 16585026 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.8.1.e2
Patt MR, Houston TK, Jenckes MW, Sands DZ, Ford DE. Doctors who are using e-mail with their patients: A qualitative exploration. J Med Internet Res. 2003; 5(2): e9. PMID: 12857665 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.5.2.e9
Lang 2nd KT, Kiel JM. An analysis of the utilization of e-mail by physicians and patients: Defining benefits, addressing concerns and forecasting implications on the doctor-patient relationship. J Healthc Inf Manag 2008; 22(2): 27-32. PMID: 19266992
Menachemi N, Prickett CT, Brooks RG. The use of physician-patient email: A follow-up examination of adoption and best-practice adherence 2005-2008. J Med Internet Res. 2011; 13(1): e23. PMID: 21447468 DOI: 10.2196/jmir.1578
Boukus ER, Grossman JM, O'Malley AS. Physicians slow to e-mail routinely with patients. Issue Brief Cent Stud Health Syst Change. 2010; 134: 1-5. PMID 20939158
Zhou YY, Kanter MH, Wang JJ, Garrido T. Improved quality at Kaiser Permanente through e-mail between physicians and patients. Health Aff. 2010; 29(7): 1370-5. PMID: 20606190 DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0048
Hobbs J, Wald J, Jagannath YS, Kittler A, Pizziferri L, Volk LA, et al. Opportunities to enhance patient and physician e-mail contact. Int J Med Inf. 2003; 70(1): 1-9. PMID: 12706177
Siva C, Lawlor K, Smarr K, Ge B, Fleming D. E-mail communication with patients: A survey of the American College of Physicians, Missouri Chapter. Mo Med. 2011; 108(2): 136-40. PMID 21568238
Sands DZ. Help for physicians contemplating use of e-mail with patients, J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2004; 11(4): 268-69. PMID: 15252925 doi: 10.1197/jamia.M1576
Houston TK, Sands DZ, Nash BR, Ford DE. Experiences of physicians who frequently use e-mail with patients. Health Communication. 2003; 15(4): 515-25.
Atherton H, Sawmynaden P, Sheikh A, Majeed A, Car J. Email for clinical communication between patients/caregivers and healthcare professionals. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2012; 8(3): 1-4. PMID: 23152249 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007978.pub2
Liebhaber AB, Grossman JM. Physicians slow to adopt patient e-mail. Data Bull (Cent Stud Health Syst Change). 2006; 32: 1-2. PMID: 16995287
Stensgaard T, Arnfjord M, Karlsen M, Mulvad G. E-mail contact between patients and doctors in primary health care. Int J Circumpolar Health. 2004; 63(sup2): 133-4.
Delbanco T, Walker J, Darer JD, Elmore JG, Feldman HJ, Leveille SG, et al. Open notes: Doctors and patients signing on. Ann Intern Med. 2010; 153(2): 121-5.
Baur C. Limiting factors on the transformative powers of e-mail in patient-physician relationships: A critical analysis. Health Communication. 2000; 12(3): 239-59. PMID: 10938915 DOI: 10.1207/S15327027HC1203_02
Adams S, Bal R, De Jong J. Full of promise, failed in practice: A discussion of barriers encountered during an attempt to integrate physician-patient e-mail communication in the care process at a Dutch eye hospital. Int J Technol Manag. 2005; 7(3-4): 252-65.
Katz SJ, Moyer CA, Cox DT, Stern DT. Effect of a triage‐based e‐mail system on clinic resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care: A randomized control trial. J Gen Intern Med. 2003; 18(9): 736-44. PMID: 12950483 doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2003.20756.x
Sciamanna CN, Rogers ML, Shenassa ED, Houston TK. Patient access to US physicians who conduct internet or e-mail consults. J Gen Intern Med. 2007; 22(3): 378-81. PMID: 17356972 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-006-0076-1
Rosen P, Kwoh CK. Patient-physician e-mail: An opportunity to transform pediatric health care delivery. Pediatrics. 2007; 120(4): 701-6. PMID: 17908755 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-1094
Roter DL, Larson S, Sands DZ, Ford DE, Houston T. Can e-mail messages between patients and physicians be patient-centered? Health Commun. 2008; 23(1): 80-6. PMID: 18443995 DOI: 10.1080/10410230701807295
Luo J, Logan C, Long TP, Bercovitch L. Cyberdermatoethics I: Ethical, legal, technologic, and clinical aspects of patient-physician e-mail. Clin Dermatol . 2009; 27(4): 359-66. PMID: 19539163 DOI: 10.1016/j.clindermatol.2009.02.008
Broom A. Virtually healthy: The impact of internet use on disease experience and the doctor-patient relationship. Qual Health Res. 2005; 15(3): 325-45. PMID: 15761103 DOI: 10.1177/1049732304272916