Introduction: One of the most important issues in managing diabetes is the periodic checkups and tests to prevent the secondary complications of the disease. Low level of literacy in patients with diabetes, and the widespread use of abbreviations and numbers in the lab test results, makes it difficult for the patient to understand and interpret her health status. The purpose of this study is to design an expert system based on clinical guidelines in order to interpret the laboratory test results to patients and provide relevant recommendations in a textual report.
Material and Methods: The study consists of two phases: the design and the evaluation. Design phase consists of 4 stages. In the first step, based on a Delphi study, the biological and laboratory tests, periodically measured for diabetic patients, were identified. In the second phase, according to the American Diabetes Association guideline, the rules for the interpretation of tests were extracted. In the third stage, an observational study was conducted to identify the elements of explanations that were provided by the physician about the results of patients' tests. In the fourth stage, the template messages were designed. In the evaluation phase, 12 diabetic patients assessed the usability of the generated report in two aspects of the visual design and the content. Five indices of apparent attractiveness, ease of comprehension, applicability, description adequacy, and novelty of content was evaluated with a 5-point Likert scale checklist.
Results: The results of the Delphi study revealed that routine tests for diabetic patients included three profiles (e.g. blood glucose, blood lipids, and kidney status), with two examinations (e.g. blood pressure and weight). The structure of the report was designed according to the patient physician communication at visit sessions. Each section of the report includes three types of feedback: descriptive, comparative, and conclusive statements. The average age of participants was 56.4 years with 72.1% women. Patients believed that the report was attractive with an average score of 9.3, and evaluated the report's comprehensiveness with an average score of 9.4. The usability (8.3), the information adequacy (8.7) and the novelty (8.2) were also perceived acceptable by patients.Conclusion: The results showed that the report was acceptable from the perspective of diabetic patients, and patients would like to get more information about their health status. The findings of this study can be used as guidance to design of the next phase of the study, e.g. evaluation of intervention effectiveness.
Sadeghie Ahari, S., et al., The effect of complications of type II diabetes on patients’ quality of life. Journal of Ardabil University of medical sciences, 2008. 8(4): p. 394-402.
Farzi, J. Design of electronic medical records for diabetic patients. in Procceding of the 4th Local Conference of Electronicc Health. 2004.
Harati, H., H. Hamyeli-Mehrabani, and M. Fardpour, Diabetes and Meal Planning (Basic). 2011, Tehran: Bahram Publishing. 72.
Weymann, N., M. Härter, and J. Dirmaier, Information and decision support needs in patients with type 2 diabetes. Health informatics journal, 2016. 22(1): p. 46-59.
Al Sayah, F., et al., Health literacy and health outcomes in diabetes: a systematic review. Journal of general internal medicine, 2013. 28(3): p. 444-452.
Khosravi, A., et al., Health Literacy Levels of Diabetic Patients Referred to Shiraz Health Centers and Its Effective Factors. Health Information Management: p. 205.
Tol, A., et al., Determination of knowledge and health literacy among women with type 2 diabetes in teaching hospitals of TUMS. Journal of Hospital, 2012. 11(3): p. 45-52.
Negarandeh, R., et al., Teach back and pictorial image educational strategies on knowledge about diabetes and medication/dietary adherence among low health literate patients with type 2 diabetes. Primary care diabetes, 2013. 7(2): p. 111-118.
Jahanlou, A.S. and N.A. Karami, The effect of literacy level on health related-quality of life, self-efficacy and self-management behaviors in diabetic patients. Acta Medica Iranica, 2011. 49(3): p. 153-158.
Shahrakivahed, A., et al., A study on the assessment of educational needs of diabetic patients. 2013.
Browne, D., et al., What do patients with diabetes know about their tablets? Diabetic medicine, 2000. 17(7): p. 528-531.
Heisler, M., et al., The relative importance of physician communication, participatory decision making, and patient understanding in diabetes self‐management. Journal of general internal medicine, 2002. 17(4): p. 243-252.
Kenny, T., et al., A PIL for every ill? Patient information leaflets (PILs): a review of past, present and future use. Family Practice, 1998. 15(5): p. 471-479.
George, M. One Size Does Not Fit All: Matching Patient Education Material to Individual Needs. in 2017 AAAAI Annual Meeting. 2017. Aaaai.
Noar, S.M., C.N. Benac, and M.S. Harris, Does tailoring matter? Meta-analytic review of tailored print health behavior change interventions. Psychological bulletin, 2007. 133(4): p. 673.
Kreuter, M.W., et al., Tailoring health messages: Customizing communication with computer technology. 2013: Routledge.
Griffin, J., K. McKenna, and L. Tooth, Written health education materials: Making them more effective. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 2003. 50(3): p. 170-177.
Abraham, C. and M. Kools, Writing health communication: An evidence-based guide. 2011: Sage.
Short, C.E., E.L. James, and R.C. Plotnikoff, Theory-and evidence-based development and process evaluation of the Move More for Life program: a tailored-print intervention designed to promote physical activity among post-treatment breast cancer survivors. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2013. 10(1): p. 1.
Tara, M., Aspects of Information Tailoring in the 21st Century. 2015.
Koonce, T.Y., et al., A personalized approach to deliver health care information to diabetic patients in community care clinics. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 2015. 103(3): p. 123.